Re: [PMC-VOTE] Bylaws

[Sam Ruby]

I'm uncomfortable with the two places where the bylaws talk about 
requiring unanimous votes.  Both talk about the extremely rare case of 
removing a committer and/or PMC member.  Particularly in the case of a 
rogue committer, swift action may be required.

My concern is that unamimous does not scale to the current "all active 
committers who have been around long enough to establish a track record" 
approach to defining PMC membership.

From a board perspective, the chair of the PMC is held accountable to 
such decisions.  If such a chair were ever to run amuck, then the board 
would simply replace the chair.

- Sam Ruby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]