On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm uncomfortable with the two places where the bylaws talk about > requiring unanimous votes. Both talk about the extremely rare case > of removing a committer and/or PMC member. Particularly in the case > of a rogue committer, swift action may be required.
Would this become any better if we used any arbitrary majority number like 3/4 or 2/3? I don't think so. > From a board perspective, the chair of the PMC is held accountable > to such decisions. Exactly. Even if the bylaws don't spell this out, the chair would be able to act quickly on his/her own. Do you think we need to clarify the "superhuman powers" of the chair? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
