On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Otherwise I'd probably prefer an "installed" package which is not easy to do for you without access to the live servers.
workflow issue!
More than that. Think of the click-through licenses and all that, it may be illegal to distribute installed packages in an automated way. I'm not sure, though.
been thinking about that. You can only distribute the sun packages as part of a larger work IIRC. If we create a really big gump tarball that we move around, they're part of the larger work. And if we put the materials for the gump tarball in a private svn module...that's half of the issue solved.
Need to ask Geir, probably.
Anyways, its not like spice-classman has a click-through license. The primary reason to have installed packages at all are that license IIUC. For everything else, we want everyone to be able to "install packages", which we have, throug the use of <jar/> without <ant/>. But that's not a clean way to manage things. It doesn't show that the project is not being built hence the dependency is "tainted".
Right now I have a set of shell scripts that has grown over time that helps me deploy new packages,
workflow issue! (as in, I don't have the scripts :D)
if gump is to grow big(ger), it needs to be easier for people to help out in "gumpmeistering".
-- cheers,
- Leo Simons
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ Component Community -- http://componentplanet.org/ Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but people wouldn't obey the rules." -- Alan Bennett
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
