Stefano replied:
Any preference on if we keep ./python/gump or move to ./gump. [I go back and forth]
I would strongly suggest to remove all mentions to programming language, unless there is a clear need to do so but this doesn't seem like the case here.
I will try to get to it. I am shy of doing this 'cos last time I tried, SVN crapped out part way. Perhaps some resource thing with such a big move, or something. Maybe I'll try it commandline on ASF hardware, so no network woes to add to the problem.
Any preference for the main scripts (entry points) to be in bin, or in root? [I think bin, to follow what Nicola started.]
I would like to have *one* script, in root, called "gump" that did everything (and may call other scripts in ./bin, I don't care).
Ok, well you now have one script in the root doign the main thing (a full run). It is the same as the cron/gump.py except meant for humans (so gives output). ["Yahoo, about darn time", shouts Nicola in the distance. ;-) ]
Mind you, it could (perhaps) do with being merged with Nicola's gmp.sh work in bin, which gives full access to everything. Still, it is a step in the right direction.
regards
Adam
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
