Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

Stefano replied:


Any preference on if we keep ./python/gump or move to ./gump. [I go back and forth]


I would strongly suggest to remove all mentions to programming language, unless there is a clear need to do so but this doesn't seem like the case here.


I will try to get to it. I am shy of doing this 'cos last time I tried, SVN crapped out part way. Perhaps some resource thing with such a big move, or something. Maybe I'll try it commandline on ASF hardware, so no network woes to add to the problem.

did you try to do a remove move?

Any preference for the main scripts (entry points) to be in bin, or in
root? [I think bin, to follow what Nicola started.]

I would like to have *one* script, in root, called "gump" that did everything (and may call other scripts in ./bin, I don't care).


Ok, well you now have one script in the root doign the main thing (a full run). It is the same as the cron/gump.py except meant for humans (so gives output). ["Yahoo, about darn time", shouts Nicola in the distance. ;-) ]

Mind you, it could (perhaps) do with being merged with Nicola's gmp.sh work in bin, which gives full access to everything. Still, it is a step in the right direction.

expects patches soon ;-)

--
Stefano.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to