On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Avalon sources sitting in CVS are good, as I mentioned in my > list of possible actions.
Yes, I understood that. I don't follow excalibur development so I don't know what has happened to -compatibility and -i18n. IMHO: If they are still under development, we should try to build them from Excalibur. If they are no longer under any development, then turn them into installed packages using the latest releases from Avalon. Users of those packages should be aware of the fact that the product has become "stable" or "unmaintained" - depends on interpretation. But making them aware is outside of Gump's scope IMHO. > However, if you don't get Gump to Nag the Excalibur community a LOT We shouldn't nag anybody who doesn't want it. > I would suggest that give Steve a couple of days, Sure, if it is something that is fixable by him. > and if he can't figure it out, move the issue to Brett Porter since > he has promised to solve all Maven-Gump issues. If a project no longer exists, this is hardly a Maven-Gump issue 8-) The one thing I'd love to get resolved is the version. It seems as if we currently don't manage to override the hard coded version numbers. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
