I think that it's more complex then just turning it on or off.. I'm in favor of turning it off for now if thats the only option. What I prefer is that if a prereq doesn't build/builds finally, I don't get nagged. That is what generates (typically) the flood of emails... I only care if my project doesn't build/builds...
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 8:43 PM > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [vote] turning off nagging until we feel gump is solid > enough for that > > > +1. Our probes are getting more done than nagging right now. > > On Nov 30, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > I think gump's nagging is currently making more noise than signal and > > this is hurting our ability to come across as helpful instead of > > annoying. > > > > I propose to turn off nagging until we fix this, we are the only one > > making changes to the metadata anyway, so there is no much point in > > that. > > > > WDYT? > > > > -- > > Stefano. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
