On Monday 13 December 2004 16:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I think at least Stefan(o) prefer Gump an approach where Gump can > parse Maven POMs directly.
:o) Cool. But you are back to some of the problems listed for approach "1.", e.g. there are artifacts that are not inter-project consistent. So, POM *alone* is not enough, but can remove the need for a "gump" goal in Maven. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
