On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, the algorithm I have in my head (come to apachecon! We can > talk about it! :-))
I'll be there - and at the hackathon. Plenty of time to discuss it. > would mean that a migrated project would be "*-ed", ie built and > linked against but considered to have an error, and that the > corresponding module would be considered failed, and that the > failure cause for the project would point to the module. Sounds fine. > The following e-mails would be sent: > - to the module "owner" about the problem (every day) only works if the module owner is able to change the module defintion in Gump's metadata. > Basically, we make "modules" (and repositories and other parts of > the object model) first-class citizens in the gump world, and > support notification about them just as well or just as bad as for > "projects". +1 Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
