> That what common-user@ is for. Is it? AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. Nor do I see it documented anywhere that common-user@ is for cross hadoop user questions. Also, FWIW, that list is documented at hadoop.apache.org -> common -> developers -> mailing lists -- not very intuitive.
Nige On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 21:23, Eric Baldeschwieler <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I'd love to have a list that covers most of what is on general (big topics >> on governance, etc), but does not have usage questions on it. I'd suggest >> creating a new list for that and letting general become a general questions >> list. > > That what common-user@ is for. > >> On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> This project has a lot of email lists [*] -- but I feel we're either >>> missing 1 or 2 lists or we have too many. Given all our lists, it's not >>> clear which one we should use to talk about cross project dev issues and >>> cross project community/policy issues. general@ has perhaps become a catch >>> all list with user, dev, and community issues inter-mixed. Is that what we >>> want? Should we create more lists to break out these topics? Live with >>> the current inter-mingling? Or consolidate some lists? >>> >>> Nige >>> >>> [*] I may have missed some: >>> general@ >>> security@ >>> private@ >>> common-user@ >>> common-dev@ >>> common-commits@ >>> common-issues@ >>> hdfs-user@ >>> hdfs-dev@ >>> hdfs-commits@ >>> hdfs-issues@ >>> mapreduce-user@ >>> mapreduce-dev@ >>> mapreduce-commits@ >>> mapreduce-issues@ >> >>
