+1 (for a second time). On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Jakob Homan <[email protected]> wrote:
> This code has been broken for a long time and, while it's still in use > in some companies, they've had a long time to offer fixes. > > +1 on abandoning it. > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Eli Collins <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't think we should remove HDFSProxy because Hoop exists, I think >>>> we should remove it because it's broken and not being maintained. >>>> Broken and un-maintained code should be removed no? >>> >>> That'd remove large chunks of hadoop. >>> >> >> We've made good progress removing broken / unmaintained code from >> Hadoop. Common no longer contains any contrib projects. And HDFS is >> down to two (hdfs proxy and fuse-dfs, and the latter is actually >> maintained, by myself and others). >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >>
