+1 (non binding) I am always in favor of removing dead code. If anyone ever does want to look at it or fix it and bring it back in they can go back to an older version. That is part of what version control is for.
-- Bobby Evans On 7/20/11 4:26 PM, "Eli Collins" <[email protected]> wrote: Let's remove the HDFS proxy contrib component. It has not had a meaningful contribution in almost a year. We had to disable the tests in HDFS-1666 because it is broken an no one has been willing to maintain it. Nigel started this vote previously, with the exception of one vote everyone was +1. I tried several to follow up on the original thread a couple of times but I never got a response so I figured I'd start a new vote. Btw, Alejandro is contributing a full HDFS proxy replacement (also supports read/write, kerberos, etc) in HDFS-2178. I'm +1. Thanks, Eli 1. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
