On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:55PM, [email protected] wrote: > But did he do the lease recovery (for more info: HDFS-265) ? I haven seen > the initiation of lease recovery by Konst, but haven't seen acks.
I am not sure I follow you, Milind. HDFS_265 has been in since 0.21. Are you referring to some new development that I might've missed? Cos > - milind > > On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >KOnstantin has stepped forward a couple of days ago ;) > > > >On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:08PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> Has anyone seen the RM for 0.22 lately ? > >> > >> - milind > >> > >> On 9/9/11 1:46 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> >> The release manager - not the developers - are responsible for and > >> >> have the final say as to what patches get merge to their branch. > >> > > >> >That is simply false. At no time is any individual responsible for > >> >any part of Apache subversion, no matter how obscure the branch. > >> >No RM has the final say on anything other than their own work. > >> >That is, they can choose not to produce a release candidate. > >> >Furthermore, at no time whatsoever does any person "own" the job > >> >of being RM -- there can be five active RMs on a single branch, > >> >each producing release candidates based on what is in subversion > >> >at the particular time that they decide to tag and build. > >> > > >> >> If the RM wants all this work they need to either corral the > >>developers > >> >> to do the merging or do the merging themselves. In short, it's their > >> >> responsibility to get people to invest in the branch. > >> > > >> >That is true of anyone, on or off the PMC -- not just the RM. > >> > > >> >....Roy > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
