On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:17PM, [email protected] wrote: > Never mind. It was an oblique reference to client not writing to a file > for a long time, so hdfs recovering the lease. (RM=client, release=file, > recovery=transferring RM role. :-)
Very clever ;) I don't think there's a competition. There's room for more, I am sure! Cos > - milind > > On 9/9/11 2:58 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:55PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> But did he do the lease recovery (for more info: HDFS-265) ? I haven > >>seen > >> the initiation of lease recovery by Konst, but haven't seen acks. > > > >I am not sure I follow you, Milind. HDFS_265 has been in since 0.21. Are > >you > >referring to some new development that I might've missed? > > > >Cos > > > >> - milind > >> > >> On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >KOnstantin has stepped forward a couple of days ago ;) > >> > > >> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:08PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> Has anyone seen the RM for 0.22 lately ? > >> >> > >> >> - milind > >> >> > >> >> On 9/9/11 1:46 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> >> >> The release manager - not the developers - are responsible for and > >> >> >> have the final say as to what patches get merge to their branch. > >> >> > > >> >> >That is simply false. At no time is any individual responsible for > >> >> >any part of Apache subversion, no matter how obscure the branch. > >> >> >No RM has the final say on anything other than their own work. > >> >> >That is, they can choose not to produce a release candidate. > >> >> >Furthermore, at no time whatsoever does any person "own" the job > >> >> >of being RM -- there can be five active RMs on a single branch, > >> >> >each producing release candidates based on what is in subversion > >> >> >at the particular time that they decide to tag and build. > >> >> > > >> >> >> If the RM wants all this work they need to either corral the > >> >>developers > >> >> >> to do the merging or do the merging themselves. In short, it's > >>their > >> >> >> responsibility to get people to invest in the branch. > >> >> > > >> >> >That is true of anyone, on or off the PMC -- not just the RM. > >> >> > > >> >> >....Roy > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
