2 1 3 4 5 (non-binding)
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek <sma...@cloudera.com> wrote: > 2 > 1 > 3 > 4 > 5 > > My vote is non-binding, fwiw. > > -Shaneal > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>>> We've discussed several options: >>>> >>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>>> hole. >>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >>>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >>>> >>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >>>> >>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >>> >>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or >>> PMC >>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote: >> >> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding. >> >> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days. >> >> Thanks for voting Roman. >> >> Arun -- Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
