3,4,2,1 - non binding Thanks,
Todd On Mar 20, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler <eri...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > 3,4,2,1 non-binding > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read: >> >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> >> instead of >> >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> >> >> Let me restart the vote. >> >> Arun >> >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> We've discussed several options: >>> >>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >>> hole. >>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >>> >>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >>> >>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Arun >>> >>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >>> >> >> -- >> Arun C. Murthy >> Hortonworks Inc. >> http://hortonworks.com/ >> >> >
