(5)
At 2012-03-20 08:13:01,"Arun C Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >We've discussed several options: > >(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone >discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >thanks, >Arun > >[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
