+1 (non binding) On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 -C > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Eli Collins <e...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> Per this thread [1] should we have a single set of committers for the >> entire Hadoop project, ie all subprojects? >> >> If the vote passes, current and future committers will gain commit >> rights in all current (Common, HDFS, MapReduce, YARN) and future >> Hadoop subprojects. The specific change to the bylaws follows: >> >> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml >> =================================================================== >> --- main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml (revision >> 1376823) >> +++ main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml (working >> copy) >> @@ -64,10 +64,9 @@ >> <li> <strong>Committers</strong> >> >> <p>The project's Committers are responsible for the project's >> - technical management. Committers have access to a specified >> - set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on >> - subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion >> - regarding that subproject.</p> >> + technical management. Committers have access to all subproject >> + subversion repositories. Committers may cast binding votes on >> + any technical discussion regarding that subproject.</p> >> >> >> This vote will run for 7 days. Since the vote represents a >> modification of the bylawys [2] it requires a lazy majority of active >> PMC members. >> >> 1. http://s.apache.org/WW1 >> 2. http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html >> >> Here's my +1
-- Harsh J
