I feel this proposal is taking us in the wrong direction.

Apache Board has encouraged us to move to TLPs. We did follow through partially 
with Pig, Hive, HBase. Chris M, in the other thread, has made good arguments, 
drawing from the larger apache experience,  on why the remaining hadoop sub 
projects should follow the Apache way and move to TLPs.  The communities for 
HDFS and MR are quite distinct when you examine the contributions of each 
committer or who participates in design discussions for each of the 
sub-projects.

I would like to see a discussion on a plan to get us to TLPs.
Hence my vote is -1;   lets have the TLP discussion first because the vote on 
the proposal in this thread is taking taking us in the opposite direction.

sanjay



On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Eli Collins wrote:

> Per this thread [1] should we have a single set of committers for the
> entire Hadoop project, ie all subprojects?
> 
> If the vote passes, current and future committers will gain commit
> rights in all current (Common, HDFS, MapReduce, YARN) and future
> Hadoop subprojects. The specific change to the bylaws follows:
> 
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml    (revision 
> 1376823)
> +++ main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml    (working copy)
> @@ -64,10 +64,9 @@
>    <li> <strong>Committers</strong>
> 
>         <p>The project's Committers are responsible for the project's
> -        technical management. Committers have access to a specified
> -        set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on
> -        subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion
> -        regarding that subproject.</p>
> +        technical management. Committers have access to all subproject
> +        subversion repositories. Committers may cast binding votes on
> +        any technical discussion regarding that subproject.</p>
> 
> 
> This vote will run for 7 days. Since the vote represents a
> modification of the bylawys [2] it requires a lazy majority of active
> PMC members.
> 
> 1. http://s.apache.org/WW1
> 2. http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html
> 
> Here's my +1

Reply via email to