-1 Given the other discussion related to TLP and the proposal here is essentially going in the opposite direction.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Eli Collins <e...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > Hi Eli, > > > > On Aug 28, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > >>> [...snip...] > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> I'd start a separate discussion thread or vote about moving some or > >> all of the sub-projects to TLPs. IMO we should resolve this issue > >> independently - there's no reason to block this decision on a possible > >> future direction for the project. > > > > I think it's a mischaracterization to suggest that Arun's proposal is a > future > > direction for the project. The project is already there and has been > there for > > a while, during this time trying to identify itself as one project when > in reality > > it's been many. That's the cause of issues like this and all the email > bandwidth. > > > > We've talked about eventually moving the sub-projects to TLPs, so > perhaps it's more of a "future state" than a "future direction". > However it's also not that cut and dry, after all the sub-project > discussion and the "project split" we've actually started going the > other direction in some ways, specifically, we've > - Merged all the code bases to a single repository, shared more source > code. > - Decided to continue to release all components together. > - Merged the user community to a single list. > - Started YARN in the Hadoop project rather than the incubator > > Anyway, seems like mincing words, and a vote thread isn't a great > place to discuss specifics of one particular TLP proposal. If you > think the time is right for the TLP and you've got a particular > proposal sounds like you should start a DISCUSS thread for that > proposal. > > Thanks, > Eli > -- http://hortonworks.com/download/
