Matt, Could you also update HowToReleasePostMavenization or ping me when you made your update and I will update it to match.
Thanks, Tom On 3/8/13 4:16 PM, "Matt Foley" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If future Hadoop RMs would >> be willing to drop us a note and indicate when the branch >> is in a shape where Bigtop feedback is ready to be received >> I think that'll be the best way to proceed. > > >This info is always broadcast to [email protected], >but I will try to remember to send such a pre-announcement directly >to Bigtop also. In fact, I'll modify the HowToRelease instructions to >incorporate this as a step. > >Would you like that to be sent to [email protected]? > >Thanks, >--Matt > > > >On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> The issue that a downstream >> >> integration project is likely to have is - for once - the absence of >> >> regularly published development artifacts. In the light of "it didn't >> >> happen if there's no picture" here's a couple of examples: >> > >> > Maybe I wasn't clear, apologies, my request is simpler: Can Bigtop >> validate a Hadoop RC? >> >> The short answer to this is -- yes. It would be extremely nice if >> we don't have to wait till the first official RC but could jump on >> the branch somewhat sooner. That, of course, would require >> a higher degree of coordination. If future Hadoop RMs would >> be willing to drop us a note and indicate when the branch >> is in a shape where Bigtop feedback is ready to be received >> I think that'll be the best way to proceed. >> >> Do you think this would be a reasonable agreement? >> >> On a related subject -- it would be extremely nice if Hadoop >> community can help us with planning the bill of materials >> for the future release of Bigtop. Essentially taking a bit >> of a more active role in yay'ing or nay'ing our version >> choices. There's a thread on LTS Bigtop releases that >> Cos started but I think we can only hope to have an LTS >> if the underlying Hadoop is also LTS'ish. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >>
