Hi Tom, Yes, I will also update HowToReleasePostMavenization. Thanks, --Matt
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Thomas Graves <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt, > > Could you also update HowToReleasePostMavenization or ping me when you > made your update and I will update it to match. > > Thanks, > Tom > > On 3/8/13 4:16 PM, "Matt Foley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> If future Hadoop RMs would > >> be willing to drop us a note and indicate when the branch > >> is in a shape where Bigtop feedback is ready to be received > >> I think that'll be the best way to proceed. > > > > > >This info is always broadcast to [email protected], > >but I will try to remember to send such a pre-announcement directly > >to Bigtop also. In fact, I'll modify the HowToRelease instructions to > >incorporate this as a step. > > > >Would you like that to be sent to [email protected]? > > > >Thanks, > >--Matt > > > > > > > >On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Arun C Murthy <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> >> The issue that a downstream > >> >> integration project is likely to have is - for once - the absence of > >> >> regularly published development artifacts. In the light of "it didn't > >> >> happen if there's no picture" here's a couple of examples: > >> > > >> > Maybe I wasn't clear, apologies, my request is simpler: Can Bigtop > >> validate a Hadoop RC? > >> > >> The short answer to this is -- yes. It would be extremely nice if > >> we don't have to wait till the first official RC but could jump on > >> the branch somewhat sooner. That, of course, would require > >> a higher degree of coordination. If future Hadoop RMs would > >> be willing to drop us a note and indicate when the branch > >> is in a shape where Bigtop feedback is ready to be received > >> I think that'll be the best way to proceed. > >> > >> Do you think this would be a reasonable agreement? > >> > >> On a related subject -- it would be extremely nice if Hadoop > >> community can help us with planning the bill of materials > >> for the future release of Bigtop. Essentially taking a bit > >> of a more active role in yay'ing or nay'ing our version > >> choices. There's a thread on LTS Bigtop releases that > >> Cos started but I think we can only hope to have an LTS > >> if the underlying Hadoop is also LTS'ish. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Roman. > >> > >
