+1
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > -sandy > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 ( non-binding ) > > > > -- Hitesh > > > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Robert Evans wrote: > > > >> As per Aaron's request I am starting a new voting thread to make it > obvious that there is a vote happening. > >> > >> I propose that we change the term "lazy consensus" to "consensus > approval" (aka s/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi) in the bylaws so > that it matches the terms used in the apache foundation glossary. No > actual change to our voting would take place, just the term we use to > describe that voting. > >> > >> As per the by-laws this would take a "lazy majority" of active PMC > members (although others are encouraged to speak up). > >> > >> Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and > more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > >> > >> Voting lasts 7 days, so it closes Monday April 1st (But this is not a > joke). > >> > >> I am +1 (binding) > >> > >> --Bobby > > >
