Bobby, they're on to us! ;)
On 26 March 2013 08:35, Steve Loughran <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25 March 2013 18:28, Robert Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As per Aaron's request I am starting a new voting thread to make it > > obvious that there is a vote happening. > > > > I propose that we change the term "lazy consensus" to "consensus > approval" > > (aka s/lazy\s+consensus/consensus approval/gi) in the bylaws so that it > > matches the terms used in the apache foundation glossary. No actual > change > > to our voting would take place, just the term we use to describe that > > voting. > > > > As per the by-laws this would take a "lazy majority" of active PMC > members > > (although others are encouraged to speak up). > > > > Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more > > binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > > > > Voting lasts 7 days, so it closes Monday April 1st (But this is not a > > joke). > > > > I am +1 (binding) > > > > > +!, non-binding, with the caveat that my sed skills aren't enought to > verify that when the title of this vote is executed it isn't going to > insert a mandate that all future work will be done in Perl and Z80 > assembler. > -- NS
