I thought I saw an email from Chris Douglas explaining why this vote may not be valid? What is the resolution?
-----Original Message----- From: Arpit Gupta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RESULT] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5 I was not aware that committers had binding vote on this. Can i still vote? Or can the vote be extended? -- Arpit Gupta Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On May 14, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <[email protected]> wrote: > > The vote count is wrong: > > 6 binding +1s > 5 binding -1s > 4 non-binding +1s > 2 non-binding -1s. > > I think you mis-counted stevel, whose vote is binding. > > On May 14, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > >> This vote passes with >> 6 binding +1s >> 4 non-binding +1 >> 4 binding -1 >> 3 non-binding -1 >> >> Thank you for voting, >> --Konstantin >> >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Please vote on the following plan for Hadoop release 2.0.5 >>> - bug fixes encountered in current release 2.0.4-alpha >>> - make all API changes to allow freezing them post 2.0.5 >>> - no new features >>> >>> As discussed on @dev thread >>> http://s.apache.org/fs >>> this will allow to stabilize 2.0 branch in a short and predictable >>> period of time. >>> This enables a powerful option to have the release tested at Yahoo scale. >>> The plan is to follow up with 2.1.0 - the stable release. >>> New features can and should be added on top of the stable release >>> once it is out. >>> >>> Hadoop by-laws: >>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html >>> >>> "Release Plan >>> Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also >>> nominates a Release Manager. >>> Lazy majority of active committers" >>> >>> assume nomination of a Release Manager with the plan. >>> It would be really good if Arun continues if this plan is adopted. >>> We can return to the RM topic if not. >>> >>> The vote will run for 7 days until next Wed, May 8th. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> --Konstantin >>> >
