That's because i thought this was a PMC vote. I marked mine as non binding as I'm only a commiter. Now that the NSW of this badly structured vote is clearer, I would vote -1 binding on it unless it was clarified better and accounted with a policy to receive how you would get forward API compatibility while keeping out those features that you seem personally opposed to.. On 14 May 2013 21:42, "Konstantin Shvachko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Vinod, > > Steve explicitly marked his vote as non-binding. > I counted it as such. > > Thanks, > --Konst > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The vote count is wrong: > > > > 6 binding +1s > > 5 binding -1s > > 4 non-binding +1s > > 2 non-binding -1s. > > > > I think you mis-counted stevel, whose vote is binding. > > > > On May 14, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > > > This vote passes with > > > 6 binding +1s > > > 4 non-binding +1 > > > 4 binding -1 > > > 3 non-binding -1 > > > > > > Thank you for voting, > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > >> Please vote on the following plan for Hadoop release 2.0.5 > > >> - bug fixes encountered in current release 2.0.4-alpha > > >> - make all API changes to allow freezing them post 2.0.5 > > >> - no new features > > >> > > >> As discussed on @dev thread > > >> http://s.apache.org/fs > > >> this will allow to stabilize 2.0 branch in a short and predictable > > period > > >> of time. > > >> This enables a powerful option to have the release tested at Yahoo > > scale. > > >> The plan is to follow up with 2.1.0 - the stable release. > > >> New features can and should be added on top of the stable release once > > it > > >> is out. > > >> > > >> Hadoop by-laws: > > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html > > >> > > >> "Release Plan > > >> Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also > > nominates a > > >> Release Manager. > > >> Lazy majority of active committers" > > >> > > >> assume nomination of a Release Manager with the plan. > > >> It would be really good if Arun continues if this plan is adopted. > > >> We can return to the RM topic if not. > > >> > > >> The vote will run for 7 days until next Wed, May 8th. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> --Konstantin > > >> > > > > >
