Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Ken expressed concern: >
> Please note that the text did offer either approach as acceptable, and up to > each PMC, so I am not entirely sure of the real point of contention. If the > PMC prefers one over the other, use it. But only one is described as '... Best Practice for ASF projects ...' and since text is aimed at incubator projects, it seems such projects will try to follow the ASF best practice, so it's not really a balanced choice between the two. The history of this discussion was that folks were somewhat unhappy that the Derby PPMC voted a committer in without following either of the ways described, even though that document was added after the vote was complete! So to make "every one" happy we voted to changed to the "ASF best practice" as described on the incubator site, and then still there are complaints. As an incubator project it sometimes feels you can't win because there is no single idea of how an ASF project should be run. Dan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
