On 11/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is not a kind of attitude i would expect from a professional organization. a big part of joining apache is the desire for a stable and maintained infrastructure. we (wicket) came here from sf.net. things used to go down there all the time, but they would get fixed - it wasnt a matter of a "want" but part of the service they provide. sorry to rant, but its very disappointing to see things like these here.
This is a volunteer organization. Stuff gets fixed when people volunteer to do so. If nobody volunteers to do so, it doesn't get fixed. There are portions of our infrastructure that is maintained at a very high level of reliability (email, svn, web pages), and portions that are less so (the various wikis, for one reason or another). If more people with the appropriate skills volunteer to help maintain those (and recently some more people have volunteered to help with confluence) then they will get better support than they have in the past. If not, then they won't. This is no different than any other volunteer driven project. If someone showed up at Wicket and demanded that their bug in an obscure part of the system get immediate attention despite the fact that everyone was busy working on other things I doubt you'd all jump up, drop what you're doing and go fix their problem, so why are you surprised when that happens in other places? -garrett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
