Noel
I'm also with you - I don't think that - unless the ODE community have
some concerns - there is any need for any votes. I simply started a
vote on general because I thought it might be quicker than arguing
about whether a vote was necessary!
AFAIC we can get on and bootstrap the PPMC now.
Paul
On 6/8/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool :) So should we have a vote on ode-dev then?
<<shrug>>
Sometimes I think that we get a bit vote happy. Is this really something
that is in need of a vote? E.g., is this a policy decision, karma grant or
code release? Does being a Mentor grant any special powers/rights? Is it
really just a term for a PMC Member who is actively engaged in the mutual
act of mentoring the community?
Now, let us say that you have a vote. The result is 6 to 4. Majority, even
60%. But I'd hardly consider that a consensus. On the other hand, if there
is a clear consensus, do we always need to explicitly count it?
Consider: do we need to vote for a release manager? The answer is no, by
the way. We vote for a release, though. We require a community decision on
the release, in large measure to protect individuals.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
