<proposed> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best practice.
After completing the vote on the PPMC list, if there are three or more binding (incubator PMC member) votes, the proposer *sends a note to* the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and vote threads by the PPMC. *Any member of the Incubator PMC can ACK the receipt of the vote. This starts a 72-hour window for lazy consensus. After 72 hours and no requests by any Incubator PMC member for a full vote by the Incubator PMC, the committer request is approved by the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer invitation process.*If there are not three binding votes in the PPMC vote, the proposer calls a vote
on the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and vote threads by the PPMC. </proposed> Craig On Jun 23, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:I'd like to ask for a vote on Justin's proposal belowThere is the missing nuance that must be addressed (see below), but with that fixed, I'm +1.On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin ErenkrantzCurrently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have: --- Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to theIncubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding thevote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best practice. After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer calls a vote on the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and vote threads by the PPMC.I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to: --- Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to theIncubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding thevote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best practice. After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer *sends a note to* the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and vote threads by the PPMC. *Any member of the Incubator PMC can ACK the receipt of the vote. This starts a 72-hour window for lazyconsensus. After 72 hours and no requests by any Incubator PMC memberfor a full vote by the Incubator PMC, the committer request is approved by the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer invitation process.*As has been noted, the text of Justin's proposal fails to address that if the vote fails to gain the required binding votes, it is NOT lazy consensus. The standard rules still apply, and the PMC vote would be required to supplement the vote, not just a lazy ratification.Proposed change to Justin's text would be "After 72 hours and no requests by any Incubator PMC member for a full vote by the Incubator PMC, and if the vote is positive (three or more binding +1 votes and no binding -1 votes), the committer request is approved by the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer invitation process."--- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
