Noel J. Bergman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
we should remember and capture that Roy raised valid points about
having the *vote* be public, albeit after private discussion. It
seemed that the idea was to discuss it in private, and only vote
in public if it was clear that the vote would go smoothly.
Offhand I don't recall his post, does anyone have a link?
Does this help?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200507.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Yup - thanks. So what happened to the mega-folded single list for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
The issues Roy raised were broader than committer votes, the whole thread
was more a matter of avoiding new podlings from falling into the backroom
discussions trap. Are we good on that front across podlings, or need some
changes at this time to reflect more activity out at podling-dev lists from
podling-private lists?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
