Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:52 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Great! Once our legal get their ducks lined up (very soon I hope),I'll
submit the official request for approval / vote. I want to resolve
the TM issues around "Traffic Server" before we do this, in case we
end up having to rename the project (but I hope it won't come to that).
Any progress on the topic?
Not yet, but apparently the legal person was away most of last week and
this week. I'll do some more prodding to get some answers here.
On a positive note, we got our report back from the 3rd party who did a
code review for IP ownership. There are a few "issues" we'll need to
resolve, but nothing major and we'll obviously have them resolved before
we push the source. The only "major" piece that might need to get
removed for now is SNMP support.
One question though to the Incubator people: Several of the issues
reported are around us using GNU configure, which is under GPL. How does
other apache projects deal with this? Is it just a matter of not
checking in the generated configure scripts, and expect people to use
the .in, .am etc files to re-generate the scripts? This doesn't sound
right though, because I'm pretty darn certain when I build Apache HTTP
for example, I don't have to run autoconf or automake.
I don't think that is a problem: httpd (and other ASF project) also uses
autconf/autoheader/automake to generate the configure that are included
in the sources tarballs.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Cheers!
-- leif
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
