Let me be clear too, I'm not trying to mess with the vote in any way,
just wondering if my email account was going nuts, as I've seen a
couple of gmail hiccups in the last days and was over-sensitive... :)

2010/1/20 Gianugo Rabellino <gian...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <gian...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala <santiago.g...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>> Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just
>>>> express your disagreement with the majority?
>>>
>>> I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't find 
>>> it...
>>
>> I just replied to the wrong email which wasn't cc'd here, apologies.
>> So let me restate here: it's a non-binding, non-vetoeing -1 based on
>
> [...]
>
> I should add: this is not an attempt to rehash a discussion that has
> been going on forever, merely a due justification for a -1 as my
> arguments have been expressed on esme-dev and not here.
>
> --
> Gianugo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to