Just a second. (Dropping TO gene...@hadoop.a.o.) Please don't confuse DISCUSSION and VOTE. BTW, it's best practice for a Incubator proposal (or any other type of initiative at Apache) to first have a DISCUSSION or PROPOSAL thread, and then have a vote afterwards, when thread hijacking is less likely.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 18:42, Eric Yang <ey...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Original incubator proposal: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Vote put forward to incubator: > > 1. recommend TLP with guides to help the initial pmc, > 2. accept incubating with tlp resource naming, but -incubating release > naming > 3. accept incubating requiring all incubator naming conventions, that might > help the incubator simplify this decision. The original vote was about said proposal, not about options. You are tallying a vote that did not take place. > Result of the vote: > > Option 1) Ant Elder, Eric Yang, William A. Rowe Jr. > Option 2) Ari Rabkin, Jerome Boulon, Chris Douglas, Greg Reddin > Option 3) Bernd Fondermann You seem to have missed a number of votes. Could you please identify binding votes for a proper tally? > > Owen O'Malley +1 on proposal > > I am not sure about Chris Mattmann¹s position, but he raised the question > about TLP. > Is it ok to keep hadoop naming until we graduate to TLP, hence, we only > rename once? ³-incubating² will be added to release artifacts. > > What is next? IMHO, Either Hadoop decides to run a TLP movement, or the Incubator conducts a proper vote. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
