To further expand on this comment: The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the Board, as no resolution was provided for voting.
Cheers, -g On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 19:11, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Now that the board has declared there are no legal > obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to > restart the vote. > > Thanks for your patience and consideration. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:44:08 PM >> Subject: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC >> >> I have come to the realization that I'm not >> going to convince Noel to see things my way >> any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a >> formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules >> for the 3 aforementioned projects. >> >> Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to >> remove the current rule that requires 3 votes from >> IPMC members to approve a vote on a new committer, >> effectively delegating the decision to the PPMC. >> Additionally the pre-ack would be removed, but no >> other process changes are anticipated. >> >> Here's my +1. >> >> >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
