+1

Dan

On Wednesday 18 August 2010 7:11:39 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
> 
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> 
> > From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:44:08 PM
> > Subject: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
> > 
> > I have come to the realization that I'm not
> > going to convince Noel to see  things my way
> > any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
> > formal majority  consensus vote on relaxed rules
> > for the 3 aforementioned  projects.
> > 
> > Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
> > remove  the current rule that requires 3 votes from
> > IPMC members to approve a vote on  a new committer,
> > effectively delegating the decision to the  PPMC.
> > Additionally the pre-ack would be removed, but no
> > other process  changes are anticipated.
> > 
> > Here's my +1.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to