I'm with James on this one. Many good points have been made on this, but we do have bigger things to worry about.
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 08:06 -0400, James Carman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:39 AM, dan haywood > <d...@haywood-associates.co.uk> wrote: > > > > For the moment at least the dev community is more active (or at least more > > vocal), so their mailing list should be the main focal point. As I said in > > the other email, when we have more user traffic than dev traffic, then > > we can vote to split them out. > > > > Why are we even having this discussion? When did mailing lists become > such a heavyweight operation that we have to discuss at length whether > they should even exist? Just create the user/dev/commits/issues lists > and be done with it. If nobody uses the user list, so be it. I think > it's just more confusing to start moving traffic from one list to > another. Keep things consistent. > > > And another benefit of putting user traffic on the dev list is that > > it'll give the devs exposure to any probs that regular users are having with > > actually using the framework (ie so we can mature its documentation etc) > > > > The developers should be "listening" to the user list so that they can > answer questions. They can't just hide in the dev list and not listen > to the community. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
