Ralph,

Your due diligence is appropriate and appreciated.  Thanks.

~Michael


On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> Thanks. That answers my only concern. I think this would be a great addition.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Soren Lassen <so...@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> I work for Google and I speak on the behalf of the Google Wave team. I
>> can assure you that Google supports the Apache Wave proposal. We
>> always wanted to transfer ownership of the open source code to the
>> developer community and, with the discontinuation of development of
>> Google Wave as a standalone product, we accelerated our efforts to
>> spin this out in order to bring certainty to the developer community.
>> Apache Wave should stand on its own without concern for Google's
>> product strategies or priorities.
>> 
>> Nonetheless, please note that Google is looking at ways to continue
>> and extend wave technology in other Google products, specifically ways
>> for users to access waves through Google Docs. But Google only retains
>> the rights to the trademark "GOOGLE WAVE" and the wave design logo.
>> Hopefully, Google will become one of many happy customers of Apache
>> Wave.
>> 
>> Soren
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> OK - Have they explicitly OK'd Apache Wave?  While Apache Wave would 
>>>>> certainly be unique to Apache, if Google intends to keep using Google 
>>>>> Wave (and Wave as a shorthand) this would get very confusing.
>>>> 
>>>> Don't you think that by proposing Wave to the Incubator that Google
>>>> has OK'd this?
>>> 
>>> I don't work for Google and don't know the people proposing this so no, I 
>>> have no idea whether Google has OK'd this.  This is no different than 
>>> someone taking an Apache project out of the Attic and starting it somewhere 
>>> else using the same name without Apache on the front. IIRC we don't allow 
>>> that.  I don't think this is paranoia but just approaching this from the 
>>> same set of rules that we use for our own projects.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to