On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> Imo it's always good to have a few pair of (active!) eyes having oversight.
>
> It's just simply too easy to miss something important - even for a
> long-time committed mentor.
>

True, it is also important about how they co-ordinate with each other and
fill the playing the role of a mentor for each other in case on mentor was
active and then he/she got busy the other picks it up from there, that is
much better than they are all active or they are all not active.


>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 2:58 PM
> > Subject: Mentors as the core of the IPMC
> >
> > One thing I would like to be bantered about:
> >
> > Long ago, it was customary to have a single mentor for a podling.
> > Nowadays, the feelings are the more, the merrier.
> >
> > Has the above been an experiment which succeeded, failed or is moot?
> > Justify your decision.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Reply via email to