>-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:44 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Flex Status > > >On May 10, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> >wrote: >>> I think we'll be able to persuade the PPMC that they don't really want to >manage >>> their own JIRA instance once that is done. So, they have a little infra >>> delay. >> >> There's a bit of history behind this. Flex was getting a bit >> frustrated at the slow migration progress, so last month I suggested >> [1] an external server as an interim solution. I totally agree that >> it's not an ideal or in any way final solution, but without some >> progress on this Flex will soon hit six months without effective >> development infrastructure. That's horrible. >> >> If not an external server, can we provision a new ASF server for this, >> perhaps just a virtual one to start with? > >Infrastructure is working on a JIRA upgrade and Flex can participate. Help is >needed with the ASF license checkbox code. I'm hoping to have cycles to help >with that next week. I have to standup JIRA at work .... > >About the fall off on the dev list. Two factors. > >- The group has a lot of energy and there was a huge amount of discussion at >the start. >- This was followed by a Logo contest with over 50 entries and two rounds of >voting on the flex-dev list. This was significant volume.
Sounds like the contest was a great success. As I noted, the traffic is still high for a podling, there just happened to be a relative drop from the beginning. I don't think anyone should be worried about activity in a podling with ~250 e-mails in the first 10 days of the month > > >> >>> I'll certainly try to suggest another report author when report time truly >arrives. >> >> Having more people with experience in writing board reports is >> definitely useful, but I don't see particular problems with this >> report. It's informative and highlights problems that the podling is >> facing. What's more to ask? >> >>> I agree with Greg that we should remove this report. >> >> There's no harm in extra out-of-cycle reports, so let's keep it. > >I see, no problem, other than no signatures. > >Regards, >Dave > >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/q3aagw5jhqz5m6b5 >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
