Marvin, While I (think I) can understand your concern (that it should be the mentors who are reviewing releases, not yet another group), I'd suggest that Jukka's approach might be a way to get there.
The incubator release process is, at the moment, pretty fraught, and I suspect there are only a handful of people who really get it. I would posit that one outcome of Jukka's suggestion is a simplified release process, which is likely to be understandable to a larger number of mentors, meaning you address your core issue. Just a thought. Upayavira On Thu, Jul 26, 2012, at 04:48 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > For example, our current release guide [1] is the result > > of quite a bit of work, but without a clear vision accompanied with a > > process of incremental improvements it's become a mess that few people > > read, let alone understand. > > I am interested in this task. > > > In concrete terms I'd like the task force to 1) be the first port of call > > for podlings who're failing to get enough +1s from their mentors > > Please exclude me from this group[1]. > > Marvin Humphrey > > [1] I believe the approach is misguided, but don't wish to rehash the > arguments, > thereby delaying potential incremental progress on other fronts. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
