On 11/1/12 7 :43AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have also found the following line of code: >> ./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml: var >>licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense(); > >Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here? No, AdobeLicense is correct. The installer is downloading and "installing" Adobe software so it is displaying the required Adobe license file which the user must acknowledge per this requirement: * For add-ons under excluded licenses <http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-x>, the PMC may include a feature within the product that allows the user to obtain third-party add-ons if the feature also alerts the user of the associated license and makes clear to users that the host site is not part of the Apache product nor endorsed by the ASF. in [1] Carol [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#labeling-reciprocity > >-- >With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >http://dataved.ru/ >+7 916 562 8095 > > >On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> Hello OmPrakash, >> >> I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache >>License: >> >> 1. The second entry for Apache license. >> 2. Something like BSD license. >> >> The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be >> resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build. >> >> So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source >>release? >> >> -- >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >> http://dataved.ru/ >> +7 916 562 8095 >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with >>>>the Apache >>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application. >>>> >>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy, >>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its >>>>dependencies. >>>> This will make it suitable for working with IDEs such as Adobe >>>>Flash >>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc. >>>> >>>> The application downloads the following dependencies: >>>> >>>> - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform >>>> - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc >>>> - SwfObject >>>> - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF) >>>> - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF) >>>> >>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well: >>>> >>>> - Adobe BlazeDS >>>> - Adobe embedded font support >>>> >>>> >>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-...@incubator.apache.org >>>>list. The >>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes. Here is the >>>>voting >>>> thread: >>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry >>>> >>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/ >>>> >>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective >>>>platforms, >>>> available here: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/ >>>> >>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>(Source kit >>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available >>>>here: >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS >>>> >>>> Here is the tag for the release: >>>> >>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-f >>>>lex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9 >>> >>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the >>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than >>> under just one of them. >>> >>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is >>>good. >>> >>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included >>> in the source archive - is that intentional? >>> If so, why is it in the tag? >>> >>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal >>> public PGP key servers. >>> >>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g. >>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL >>> in the source archive. >>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source >>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging >>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please vote: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> OmPrakash Muppirala >>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
