On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer.
>
> I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that
> installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE
> file as Adobe licensed) contains Apache license header.
After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have an
Apache header. It comes from external projects under Modified BSD. Then I
think it would make sense to have the Adobe/BSD license in the LICENSE file?
>
> Why do you need any additional attributions for Apache licensed file?
After more digging, I think this is here because these are binary files
that, while under Apache license, are not sourced from a.o, so technically,
third-party. It isn't clear from here [5] that if it is under Apache it
doesn't have to be called out in the LICENSE file.
>
> BTW, file paths are incorrect in the LICENSE file.
Agreed. But not critical?
[5] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
