Thank you, Alex
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, "Alexei Fedotov" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for explaining, I finally got Carol's point on installer. >> >> I still cannot fully understand the licensing. I have checked that >> installer/src/com/adobe/utils/IntUtil.as (which is mentioned in LICENSE >> file as Adobe licensed) contains Apache license header. > After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have an > Apache header. It comes from external projects under Modified BSD. Then I > think it would make sense to have the Adobe/BSD license in the LICENSE file? > >> >> Why do you need any additional attributions for Apache licensed file? > After more digging, I think this is here because these are binary files > that, while under Apache license, are not sourced from a.o, so technically, > third-party. It isn't clear from here [5] that if it is under Apache it > doesn't have to be called out in the LICENSE file. >> >> BTW, file paths are incorrect in the LICENSE file. > Agreed. But not critical? > > [5] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
