For the record, these are issues we are fixing in the next RC: 1. incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as 2. incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file 3. incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file 4. incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file 5. in the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root but in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root when we packaged everything.
Please let us know if anything else needs to be addressed. Thanks, Om On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Om <[email protected]> wrote: > In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread. We > are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote thread. > > Thanks, > Om > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create >> another RC.... >> >> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary >> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to >> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of >> whitespace) says they are. >> >> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just >> something to fix for a future release. >> >> -Bertrand >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
