Great, thanks. -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, we have addressed that issue. We reinstated the original license text > for the headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as > > Thanks, > Om > On Nov 5, 2012 2:35 AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Om, >> >> Alex wrote, >> > After more digging, I think the issue is that IntUtil.as shouldn't have >> an Apache header. It comes from external projects under Modified BSD. >> >> Do you plan to fix this? >> >> -- >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >> http://dataved.ru/ >> +7 916 562 8095 >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > For the record, these are issues we are fixing in the next RC: >> > >> > 1. incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as >> > 2. incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file >> > 3. incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file >> > 4. incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file >> > 5. in the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root >> but in >> > svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root >> when >> > we packaged everything. >> > >> > Please let us know if anything else needs to be addressed. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread. We >> >> are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote >> thread. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Om >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < >> >> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > ...If I were the RM, I would add the missing EOLs at EOF and create >> >>> another RC.... >> >>> >> >>> I see your point about the distributed files not being *binary >> >>> identical* to the svn tag, but I personally consider source files to >> >>> be identical if diff -b (i.e. ignore changes in the amount of >> >>> whitespace) says they are. >> >>> >> >>> So, in this case, I definitely don't see this as a blocker, just >> >>> something to fix for a future release. >> >>> >> >>> -Bertrand >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
