Hey Chris, Okay we'll focus on that distribution path for the 0.9.0 release. Thanks!
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > In fact, Sonatype will let you publish non o.a.xx dependencies since > they are an approved forge as well for Central sync. So you can sign > up for an account there, but it's always good to get the buy in of the > specific community of the upstream dependency so they are aware. > > These types of things though can be addressed over time and as each > release improves. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > Date: Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:39 PM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4) > >>Thanks Marvin and Joe, >> >>Do you know which other projects/people we might reach out to for >>institutional knowledge of how this is done? >> >>Our specific issue is that while 99% of our dependencies are in maven, >>there are a small # of dependencies that don't publish anywhere via >>maven. One solution would be if apache let us publish these to maven >>central - but I'm guessing Apache limits us to publishing o.i.a.XXX >>artifacts. >> >>- Patrick >> >>On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey >><mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>>> We are planning to do our next major release (Spark 0.9.0) while still >>>> under incubation in the next few weeks. Could I propose that we create >>>> a parallel discussion about how we might re-tool or build process with >>>> the aim towards satisfying whatever policy exists in that release? >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> That seems reasonable to me. >>> >>> We're winging it a bit, since discussions about under what >>>circumstances to >>> relax policy are ongoing (see the "IP Clearance before releasing" >>>thread). >>> However, you've taken the initiative to make a constructive proposal. >>>We >>> should work with you. >>> >>> Marvin Humphrey >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
