Hi Joseph,

Thank you very much for the clarification.

After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those 
entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.

(I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the history, 
realized I didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history).

I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those entries.

I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over at this 
point?

Thanks again for your input.

- Taylor

On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
> be asked to.
> 
> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.
> 
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use 
>> the Apache v2 license.
>> 
>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public 
>> License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license 
>> header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with the 
>> Apache v2 license header.
>> 
>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi sebb,
>>>> 
>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>>>> 
>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
>>> 
>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
>>> file(s) involved.
>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Taylor
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>>>> stay as 2013.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>>>> provided with the files.
>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>>>> required.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, 
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct 
>>>>>>> thing
>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 
>>>>>>> votes
>>>>>>> (6
>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44c5baad-0fd8-454c-84d7-c8da92442...@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3a207f1c-3b07-4029-93d4-87abeb412...@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found 
>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender 
>>>>>> immediately
>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to