I would say that is the right approach, and that this vote should continue on.
On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > Thank you very much for the clarification. > > After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those > entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee. > > (I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the history, > realized I didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history). > > I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those entries. > > I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over at > this point? > > Thanks again for your input. > > - Taylor > > On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee >> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them. But >> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should >> be asked to. >> >> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not. If you fix >> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue. >> >> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use >>> the Apache v2 license. >>> >>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public >>> License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license >>> header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with >>> the Apache v2 license header. >>> >>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us? >>> >>> -Taylor >>> >>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi sebb, >>>>> >>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file? >>>>> >>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed? >>>> >>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the >>>> file(s) involved. >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Taylor >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can >>>>>> stay as 2013. >>>>>> >>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license >>>>>> provided with the files. >>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream >>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not >>>>>> required. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I >>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies >>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this >>>>>>> release >>>>>>> and can be addressed later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the input! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct >>>>>>>> thing >>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if >>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Taylor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version >>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 >>>>>>>> votes >>>>>>>> (6 >>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Release Vote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44c5baad-0fd8-454c-84d7-c8da92442...@gmail.com%3e >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Release Vote Result: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3a207f1c-3b07-4029-93d4-87abeb412...@gmail.com%3e >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above? >>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files? >>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually >>>>>>>> included in the distributiion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found >>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating >>>>>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or >>>>>>> entity to >>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >>>>>>> reader >>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or >>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender >>>>>>> immediately >>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You. >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
