I think David asked it today because Brett, David and I shared a coffee yesterday and this was one of the topics of conversation. It's timing that's all.
The problem with working out *during* incubation is that the foundation has already committed to providing the support necessary. We need an indication upon entry. I believe David asked this question in order to start doing this informally while we figure out how to do it in a more consistent and managed way. In summary, I fully agree with your comment "We should ask the same questions to projects" and moving forwards I believe we will do so - starting now. Sent from Surface From: Chris Mattmann<mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> Sent: ?Thursday?, ?September? ?25?, ?2014 ?11?:?03? ?AM To: <general@incubator.apache.org><mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> Cc: Shoaib Sufi<mailto:shoaib.s...@manchester.ac.uk> We should ask the same questions to projects and I don't see this question of infrastructure asked very often. So I raised it. David of course is doing great and I just saw some of this as can be worked out during incubation Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 25, 2014, at 10:46 AM, "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" > <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > It's a requirement for the ASF to support its projects. Understanding what > impact each project coming into the incubator might have is important to > allow VP Infra to plan for our growth. David did not ask if Manchester will > be donating resources, he asked what do they currently provide and what does > the project think they will need from the ASF. > > For the record, I am familiar with Taverna from a previous life. It's is > interesting to see this proposal coming to the ASF. The first time this was > discussed with the University of Manchester was many years ago. The > conversation occurred every couple of years, each time with different people, > but never progressed to a proposal. Given the answers in this thread things > have changed quite considerably since then. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)<mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> > Sent: ?9/?25/?2014 10:09 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> > Cc: Shoaib Sufi<mailto:shoaib.s...@manchester.ac.uk> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow > > Hi Guys, > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > Date: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:34 AM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > Cc: Shoaib Sufi <shoaib.s...@manchester.ac.uk> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow > > [..snip..] >> >> I see two paragraphs here that don't answer the question posed. Where >> will plugin development happen in an ideal world? > > This is an implementation detail and can be dealt with during Incubation? > >> >> One followup question - what kind of build/CI resources does the >> University of Manchester provide? What manner of resources do you >> believe you'll need if the project moves to the ASF? > > Is it a requirement for projects to provide build/CI resources > now to enter the Incubator? I do not believe that it is. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
